Review By Efthimia Papageorgakopoulou

Questions:

Aims and outcomes

A. Aims and outcomes are given and written in such a way that they are clear and

measurable

B. Aims and outcomes are listed but they are either not fully clear or measurable

C. Aims and outcomes are either not listed or completely vague and inconsistent

Blending of distance & face-to-face

A. The scenario includes a meaningful integration of the distance and face-to-face

A. The level of student autonomy required is appropriate for the student profiles OR

dedicated activities support the development of student autonomy

B. The level of student autonomy is not always appropriate for their profiles OR

activities dedicated to the support of their autonomy are inadequate

C. The level of student autonomy does not fit their profiles OR activities dedicated to

the support of their autonomy are absent

Instructional materials & tools

A. Multiple types of instructional material & tools are appropriately used in the

distance or face-to-face setting and for the planned activities

B. A few types of instructional material & tools are used, mostly appropriately, for

B. Assessment activities included in the scenario are mostly suitable for the setting

and mostly indicate if the lesson outcomes have been achieved

C. Assessment activities are not included in the scenario, or they are unsuitable for

the setting / neglect if the lesson outcomes have been achieved

Engagement

A. The scenario is exciting and engaging for all learners

B. The scenario is mostly engaging or would only be engaging for some learners

C. The project is not engaging for learners

Structure & timing

A. The scenario follows a clear and logical structure, and the timing of the activities